• Sacramento:   (916) 446-5297
  • San Francisco:   (415) 266-1800

Expert Representation for Your Most Important Matters

Our attorneys form one of the most experienced teams of union-side litigators, negotiators, and representatives in all of California

About Our Firm

Responsiveness is Critical

Your issue is critical to us. Our team is highly trained and understands the significance of an immediate response

About Our Firm

Welcome to Messing Adam & Jasmine

.

Messing Adam & Jasmine LLP started in 2015 with the objective of pushing the boundaries of what it means to be “strong and knowledgeable representation.”  Our team is comprised of the finest expert attorneys in their respective fields and were hand chosen to build our firm.

Collectively, our firm has decades of experience helping clients overcome their legal challenges. We encourage you to look around and explore our services and should you have any questions at all regarding our business, practice areas, or anything else, please feel free to reach out to us.

News & Recent Developments…

16 Jan, 2019

General Right to “Be Free From Excessive Force” Not Specific Enough to Defeat Qualified Immunity

0 Comments

The United States Supreme Court issued a per curiam opinion on January 7, 2019, in City of Escondido v. Emmons, reiterating that denial of qualified immunity to a police officer in an excessive force case must be based on violation of a clearly established right that is defined with specificity. It is well-established that qualified … continue reading

03 Dec, 2018

Pension Case Oral Argument This Wednesday (Watch Live)

0 Comments

This Wednesday, December 5, at 9:00 a.m., the California Supreme Court will hear oral argument in CAL FIRE Local 2881 v. CalPERS. You can watch a webcast of the argument live at 9:00 a.m. Link for the live webcast will appear approximately 30 minutes before oral argument begins. If you do not catch the argument … continue reading

30 Nov, 2018

Early Post-Janus Win for Labor

0 Comments

Earlier this week, a Reagan-appointed judge in the Western District of Washington struck a blow against Janus inspired litigation in favor of fairness and common sense. The judge ruled in Danielson v. AFSCME that the Janus v. AFSCME opinion, which overruled decades of precedent, should not be applied retroactively to make a union reimburse fair … continue reading