• Sacramento:   (916) 446-5297
  • San Francisco:   (415) 266-1800

Labor Beat Alerts

Briefing Concluded in CAL FIRE Local 2881 v. CalPERS

   Published on:  24 Apr, 2018

Yesterday, Messing Adam & Jasmine LLP filed a Consolidated Answer to Amici Curiae in what will be among the last written submissions in CAL FIRE Local 2881 v. CalPERS et al. currently before the California Supreme Court. The State has also filed an Answer, which will be available on our website as soon as we … continue reading

Continue Reading

Justice Gorsuch Doesn’t Tip Hand in Fair Share Fees Oral Argument

   Published on:  26 Feb, 2018

Today the United States Supreme Court held oral argument in Janus v. American Federation of State, Municipal, and County Employees, a case challenging the constitutionality of “fair share fees” in public unions and in which we filed an amicus brief on behalf of PORAC and fourteen other public safety unions earlier this year. Justice Gorsuch … continue reading

Continue Reading

Merits Briefing Concluded Before CA Supreme Court in CAL FIRE Local 2881 “Air Time”

   Published on:  23 Jan, 2018

Monday, on behalf of CAL FIRE Local 2881, Messing Adam & Jasmine LLP filed the Reply Brief on the Merits in the California Supreme Court case CAL FIRE Local 2881 v. CalPERS. As many of our clients know, this is a case on review before the California Supreme Court challenging the state’s decision to violate … continue reading

Continue Reading

Public Safety Coalition Led by PORAC Files Amicus Brief Supporting Respondents in Janus v. AFSCME

   Published on:  19 Jan, 2018

On Friday, January 19, 2018, Messing Adam & Jasmine LLP, working with the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, filed a Brief for Amici Curiae Fifteen Unions and Umbrella Organizations That Provide Services to Affiliated Unions and Associations Representing Nearly Half a Million Public Safety Employees in Support of Respondents. As our public safety … continue reading

Continue Reading

Impact of Decision in ACDSA on PEPRA Constitutionality

   Published on:  11 Jan, 2018

This Monday, January 8, 2018, the California First District Court of Appeal issued an important decision in Alameda County Deputy Sheriffs’ Association v. Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Association (“ACDSA”). The decision is largely a win for the public employees and a reaffirmation of most of the key principles of the vested rights doctrine that protects … continue reading

Continue Reading

Review Granted of Decision that Law Enforcement Agencies Cannot Voluntarily Provide Brady Materials to the DA or Public Defender

   Published on:  12 Oct, 2017

Back in July, we told you about the controversial ruling in Ass’n for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. Superior Court of County of Los Angeles (Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department). See 13 JUL, 2017 post. Unsurprisingly, the Supreme Court granted the Sheriff’s Department’s petition for review. The extent of the court of appeal ruling surprised … continue reading

Continue Reading

Janus, the End of Fair Share Fees and the Next Round of Attacks on Your Pensions

   Published on:  04 Oct, 2017

Last Thursday, as has been widely reported in the media, the United States Supreme Court agreed to review the decision of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Mark Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al., Case No. 16-3638. It is expected that, with Neil Gorsuch filling the … continue reading

Continue Reading

Right to Discovery in Interrogations Explained (Expanded)

   Published on:  17 Jul, 2017

The Fourth District Court of Appeal made a significant interpretation of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (“POBR”) (Gov. Code ยง 3300 et seq.) in the case of Santa Ana Police Officers Association v. City of Santa Ana, 2017 WL 2879796 (2017) that has the potential to impact many administrative investigations of … continue reading

Continue Reading

Public Safety Departments Cannot Voluntarily Share Brady Lists With DA’s or Any Other Non-Department Persons

   Published on:  13 Jul, 2017

Law enforcement agencies cannot disclose the names or other identifying information of officers who are on Brady lists to any outside body, including prosecutorial agencies, absent compliance with the Pitchess process. This notable victory for peace officer privacy rights came this week in Ass’n for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. Superior Court of County of … continue reading

Continue Reading

Local 2881 Saves BC List

   Published on:  02 Jun, 2017

The State Personnel Board (“SPB”) denied CAL FIRE’s request at its monthly meeting on Thursday to abolish the entire 2017 Battalion Chief eligible list and force the nearly 300 candidates on the list to re-take the promotional exam during the peak fire season. The SPB also upheld the six appointments that had already been made … continue reading

Continue Reading